Frontier Watch · for AI and data leads

The frontier moves every week.We test it for you.

An independent, curated view on models, tools, protocols and agents: what is real, what matters for your setup, and what to ignore.

We're building Frontier Watch with a small group of AI leads. It starts with a 30-minute conversation.

This month · excerptFor your setup
What movedOn our benchCall
New open-weights coding modelClose on our evals, a third of the costBenchmark it
MCP servers for your SaaS stackAuth still unevenPilot, guarded
Always-on personal agentsRan a week on real tasksWatch
Yet another eval platformOverlaps what you haveIgnore
Illustrative. A note like this, about your stack.
Dailyscan of research, releases and prices by our agents
Testedtools run on our bench before they reach you
Acrosscompanies and sectors, a view no single team has
0platforms to sell you
See what you get

Every update has three layers.

From what moved in the field to what it means for your stack. Click through an example.

What moved this month
  • Agent protocols are settling. MCP is becoming the default way to connect agents to tools and data.
  • Coding agents run for hours. Long-running agents now finish multi-step tasks without a person at every step.
  • Open-weights models closed the gap again. For many tasks, self-hosting is a real option.
Why it mattersLess about which model. More about how you connect, evaluate and govern them.
  • Integration beats model choice
  • Evals become your moat
What we tested
  • Three coding agents on the same five tasks from a real codebase: time, cost and how often a person had to step in.
  • Always-on personal agents for a week on real work: where they helped, where they made things up.
  • MCP servers for common SaaS tools: what works, and where authentication breaks.
What we foundOne agent was clearly better on refactoring, none on greenfield work.
  • Results with the setup we used
  • Repeatable on your own code
For your stack
  • Pilot one coding agent with two teams, on refactoring work. Review in six weeks.
  • Wait on always-on agents until access controls mature.
  • Write an MCP policy before teams connect their own servers.
On one pageThree calls, and a short version for your CIO.
  • Depth for your team
  • Decisions for leadership

Illustrative example. Your note is written for your setup.

Founding members

We're building it with the people who'll use it.

Frontier Watch is new. We're starting with a small group of AI leads who help shape what goes into it.

  1. 130 minutes

    A conversation

    What you follow today, what costs you time, and what you'd want from us.

  2. 2First editions

    Founding member

    You get the first updates and tell us what to keep, cut or add.

  3. 3Every month

    The update

    The field, what we tested, and what it means for your stack.

  4. 4Every quarter

    Peer session

    AI leads from different companies, one room, one guest who shares their practice.

No commitment to start. The conversation already helps us, and we hope you too.

For you if
  • You lead AI, data or engineering: head of AI, data lead, CTO
  • Your teams build with models and agents, or are about to
  • You want an independent view from people who test, not sell
Not for you if
  • You want a general newsletter about AI
  • You're looking for someone to build your tools
  • Your people are just getting started: then start with the Academy

Questions.

How is this different from a newsletter?

We test what we write about, across many companies. Every update ends in three calls for your setup.

Do you use AI to make it?

Yes. Agents follow the field. People test, filter and write.

What does a founding member do?

Talk to us for half an hour, read the first editions and tell us what's useful. We set prices together with our founding members.